|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 11-18
Aberrant right subclavian artery: A multi-detector computed tomography study
CS Ramesh Babu1, Om Prakash Gupta2, Arjun Kumar2
1 Department of Anatomy, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Dr. O.P. Gupta Imaging Centre, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Submission||08-Jul-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||08-Feb-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||07-Apr-2021|
Dr. C S Ramesh Babu
Muzaffarnagar Medical College, N.H. 58, Opp. Begrajpur Industrial Area, Muzaffarnagar - 251 203, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) arises as the last branch of normally positioned aortic arch and its prevalence estimated as 0.16%–2.0% varies between different ethnic groups. Our aim was to assess the prevalence and associated branching anomalies of ARSA in the Indian participants. Material and Methods: Chest computed tomographic scans of 710 patients were analyzed to study the ARSA and its associated vascular anomalies. Results: We have observed 11 cases (5 in males and 6 in females) of ARSA with an estimated prevalence of 1.54%. In seven cases, there were four branches arising from the arch of aorta in the order of right common carotid, left common carotid, left subclavian, and aberrant right subclavian. In three cases, there were three branches – bicarotid trunk (common trunk of right and left carotids), left subclavian, and the aberrant right subclavian. In one case, there were five branches in the order of right common carotid, left common carotid, left vertebral, left subclavian, and aberrant right subclavian. Only two participants reported mild symptoms of dysphagia. In all the cases, the ARSA had retroesophageal course. Kommerell diverticulum was not observed. ARSA remain asymptomatic in most cases, but its presence should alert the clinician to look for associated vascular and any cardiac anomalies. Discussion and Conclusion: Awareness of the presence of ARSA is crucial for successful outcome of mediastinal, esophageal, and thoracic spine surgeries. Preprocedural computed tomography for the evaluation of aortic arch branching pattern will be beneficial for the successful performance of various surgical and radiological interventions.
Keywords: Arteria lusoria, bicarotid trunk, dysphagia, retroesophageal right subclavian artery, variant aortic arch branching
|How to cite this article:|
Ramesh Babu C S, Gupta OP, Kumar A. Aberrant right subclavian artery: A multi-detector computed tomography study. J Anat Soc India 2021;70:11-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Ramesh Babu C S, Gupta OP, Kumar A. Aberrant right subclavian artery: A multi-detector computed tomography study. J Anat Soc India [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 22];70:11-8. Available from: https://www.jasi.org.in/text.asp?2021/70/1/11/313154
| Introduction|| |
Arch of aorta (AA) passes from right to left arching over the root of the left lung and gives three branches brachiocephalic trunk (BT) which further divides into right common carotid (RCCA) and right subclavian arteries (RSA), left common carotid artery (LCCA), and left subclavian artery (LSA) in that order from right to left. This normal branching pattern is reported to occur in 64.9%–94.3% of population. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 23,882 arches from 51 articles by Popieluszko et al.(2018) found normal branching pattern in 80.9% cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.3–82.4). Another review of 20,030 cases estimated the prevalence of normal branching pattern as 84.52%. Increased attention is being paid to study variations in the branching pattern of aortic arch since the advent of surgical and radiological interventional procedures on supra-aortic branches. One of the common congenital anomaly of AA is the presence of aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA), which arises as the last branch of the arch to the left of the spine and generally ascends between the esophagus and spine. In such cases, the BT is absent, and the RCCA arises as the first branch and ARSA as the last branch. Clinicians name it as “Arteria Lusoria.” Although asymptomatic, its presence may cause dysphagia – Dysphagia lusoria. Reported prevalence is 0.16%–2.0% but varies widely between different ethnic groups., This anomaly has a preponderance in females., About 7%–10% of adults with this anomaly develop symptoms such as dysphagia, dyspnoea, retrosternal pain, chronic cough, and weight loss implying that this anomaly remains latent and innocuous in 90%–93% participants. It may be associated with some congenital anomalies such as patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, and conotruncal anomalies. The most common vascular anomalies associated with ARSA include bicarotid trunk (BCT) (common origin of both RCCA and LCCA), aortic arch origin of left vertebral artery (LVA), and Kommerell's diverticulum.
Different types of aortic arch branching pattern associated with ARSA have been reported in the literature which is classified into three types by Adachi-Williams. In Type I or Type G, four branches arise from the arch in the order of RCCA, LCCA, LSA, and ARSA [Figure 1]a. In Type II or Type CG, five branches arise from the arch in the order of RCCA, LCCA, LVA, LSA, and ARSA [Figure 1]b. In Type III or Type H, three branched pattern is seen with BCT, LSA followed by ARSA [Figure 1]c.
|Figure 1: Schematic figure showing Adachi-William's classification of aberrant right subclavian artery. (a) Type I (Type-G) Four branched pattern in the sequence of RCCA, left common carotid artery, left subclavian artery and Aberrant right subclavian artery. (b) Type II (Type CG) Similar to Type I but with additional branch left vertebral artery arising in between the origin of left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery. (c) Type III (Type H) with three branches– the bicarotid trunk (common trunk of both common carotids), left subclavian artery and aberrant right subclavian artery|
Click here to view
Our aim was to assess the prevalence and associated branching anomalies of ARSA in Indian participants by contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (CT). Most of the Indian studies are cadaveric studies and case reports. Only few radiological reports are available. Hence, the present, retrospective, observational study was undertaken.
| Material and Methods|| |
This retrospective observational study was done in 710 participants (males – 435 and females – 275) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT chest examination for various suspected lung and mediastinal pathologies during the period September 2015 to March 2018. The scans of the patients with malignancies likely to distort the anatomy of aorta and supra-aortic branches, poorly enhanced scans, and those with thoracic aortic disease were excluded leaving 710 participants suitable for the study. The imaging center routinely obtains informed consent before contrast injection. Volume rendered images and maximum intensity projection were obtained from the axial scans. The presence of ARSA, its course and relationship with esophagus, and associated vascular anomalies was noted.
In 11 participants (males – 5 and females – 6) ARSA was noted arising as the last branch of the AA (1.54%; 11/710). Type I (Type G) which can be described as an isolated ARSA was observed in seven participants (males – 2 and females – 5) (0.98%; 7/710) [Figure 2]. Although overall incidence did not show much gender difference, the isolated ARSA has a predominance in females. In three participants (males-2; female-1) Type III (Type H) with BCT, LSA and ARSA was noted (0.42%; 3/710) [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. In a male subject Type II (Type CG) was seen with the sequence of RCCA, LCCA, LVA, LSA, and ARSA (0.14%; 1/710) [Figure 5]. In all cases, ARSA had a retroesophageal course crossing the spine obliquely from left to right [Figure 6]. Kommerell's diverticulum was not observed in our study. In one case, the ARSA made an indentation in the esophagus and trachea [Figure 7]. Only two patients reported mild symptoms of dysphagia.
|Figure 2: (a) Volume rendered image showing Type I Aberrant right subclavian artery with four branches from aortic arch. Note the absence of brachiocephalic trunk and the direct arch origin of right common carotid (RCCA) as the first branch. (b) Axial image showing the aberrant right subclavian artery passing to the right behind the esophagus. SVC: Superior vena cava|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Volume rendered image showing Type III Aberrant right subclavian artery with the Bicarotid trunk as the first branch followed by left subclavian artery and aberrant right subclavian artery|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Axial image showing Type III Aberrant right subclavian artery with bicarotid trunk, left subclavian artery and aberrant right subclavian artery sequence. Note the position of aberrant right subclavian artery between the esophagus and the vertebral body. SVC: Superior vena cava, LBCV: Left brachiocephalic vein|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Axial image showing Type II aberrant right subclavian artery with five branched pattern and presence of left vertebral artery between left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery. Aberrant right subclavian artery is passing to the right behind esophagus|
Click here to view
|Figure 6: Coronal section showing the oblique course of aberrant right subclavian artery (arrow) in front of the spine to reach the right side|
Click here to view
|Figure 7: Sagittal section in bone window showing aberrant right subclavian artery causing an indentation (arrow) in the esophagus and trachea|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
ARSA, also named as retroesophageal right subclavian artery, arteria lusoria, arteria subclavia dextra lusoria, is a more frequently encountered congenital anomaly of aortic arch predominantly observed in females. Its presence is generally detected incidentally in cadaveric and autopsy studies, barium esophagogram, upper GI endoscopy, and many radiological modalities (such as conventional angiography, CT and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, endoscopic ultrasound, endobronchial ultrasound, and transesophageal echocardiography). Developmentally, the aortic arch and its branches develop from pharyngeal arch arteries which appear symmetrically in the pharyngeal arches. Normally, the AA develops from left aortic sac, left fourth arch artery, and part of left dorsal aorta. Right subclavian artery develops from right fourth arch artery, proximal part of right dorsal aorta, and right seventh intersegmental artery. The part of right dorsal aorta distal to seventh intersegmental artery normally involutes. Abnormal involution of the right fourth arch artery and proximal right dorsal aorta and persistence of distal part of right dorsal aorta gives rise to ARSA as the last branch of AA [Figure 8].
|Figure 8: Schematic diagram showing the developmental basis of aberrant right subclavian artery. (a) Normal development of right subclavian artery from right fourth arch artery, proximal right dorsal aorta and right seventh intersegmental artery. The distal part of right dorsal aorta normally involutes. Left fourth arch artery along with left dorsal aorta forms arch of aorta and left seventh intersegmental artery develops into left subclavian artery. Parts which disappear are shown in dotted lines. (b) Aberrant right subclavian artery develops due to abnormal involution of right fourth arch artery and proximal right dorsal aorta and persistence of distal right dorsal aorta. The common carotid arteries develop from proximal part of respective third arch arteries|
Click here to view
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 51 articles comprising 23,882 arches indicated that overall incidence of ARSA is 0.7% (95% CI is 0.2%–1.5%). If only imaging studies are included (32 articles, 20141 cases), the incidence is 0.9% (95% CI is 0.2–1.8), and in cadaveric studies (20 articles, 3740 cases), the incidence is 1.0% (95% CI 0.0–3.3). Another systematic review analyzing 20,030 cases reported an incidence of 0.91% (183/20,030) out of which 176 cases had isolated ARSA and seven cases were accompanied by secondary arteries from the arch. The present study reports a prevalence of 1.54% (11/710), which is within the range estimated by meta-analysis. The prevalence of ARSA exhibits racial differences and country-wise prevalence by radiological studies is given in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Incidence of aberrant right subclavian artery in radiological studies|
Click here to view
Natsis et al. in their study on 267 Greek cadavers reported a prevalence of 2.2% (6/267), and in one cadaver, the ARSA had a course between the trachea and esophagus. Reviewing 15 cadaveric studies initially, they estimated the incidence of ARSA as ranging from 0.2% to 13.3% but later modified it to 1.2% (range 0.19%–2.5%) after exclusion of four studies., Polednak using meta-analysis estimated the unweighted prevalence as 1.23% and pooled prevalence as 1.30% (95% CI 0.86%–1.82%). Extracting data from the published reports Molz and Burri found a prevalence of 0.7% (593 ARSAs out of 68,049 autopsy cases) and 2.3% (517/22,201 patients). Country-wise prevalence of ARSA in cadaveric studies is given in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Incidence of aberrant right subclavian artery in cadaveric studies globally|
Click here to view
ARSA also shows gender differences in its prevalence as suggested by published literature. Polguj et al. analyzing 141 published reports suggested that gender distribution was 55.3% in females and 44.7% in males. It is also suggested that isolated ARSA shows 58%–75% female predominance. In our study also isolated ARSA has a female predominance (5 female versus 2 male).
One of the vascular anomaly most commonly associated with ARSA is the presence of BCT, present in 19.2% (27/141) cases with ARSA This is classified as Type III (Type H) and its estimated prevalence is <0.05%. We have observed this type in three participants (Male 2; Female-1; 0.42%). Natsis et al. reported two cases of this variant, both in males, in a study involving 72 Greek cadavers (2.78%; 2/72) and reviewed the earlier literature. The combination of BCT with ARSA is mainly reported as case reports.,, Gluncic and Marusic reported the presence of BCT, common trunk of left subclavian and left vertebral followed by ARSA in a female cadaver. In another case report, the sequence of LSA as first branch, then BCT followed by ARSA was observed in a female patient. It must be noted that the sequence of RSA, BCT, and LSA is also observed as a variant branching pattern of aortic arch.
Another rare vascular anomaly associated with ARSA is the five-branched pattern with RCCA, LCCA, LVA, LSA, and ARSA classified as Type II (Type CG) observed in 1 male patient (0.14%). This type was found in two cases (2/2370) by Wang et al. and two cases (2/3460) by Choi et al. In a cadaveric case report, an accessory LVA was found to arise directly from the aortic arch proximal to ARSA and the normal LVA from LSA was hypoplastic. MR angiography of a female patient revealed a very rare branching pattern with BCT, LVA, LSA, and ARSA, and in this case, the right vertebral artery arose from RCCA. Tsai et al. investigated the anomalies of vertebral and common carotid arteries in 102 patients with ARSA. They reported vertebral artery anomalies in 15.7% cases (16/102 patients) and common carotid trunk (BCT) in 20.6% cases (21/102 patients). They also noted that in 84.3% (86/102 patients) cases both vertebral arteries had normal origin from corresponding subclavian arteries. In a most recent review, Plotkin et al. analyzed the data of 312 patients having aberrant subclavian arteries (both right and left) and studied the associated vascular anomalies and aortic pathology. The study included 281 ARSA patients and 31 aberrant LSA (ALSA) patients. In ARSA group the LVA had direct arch origin in 9 patients only and subclavian artery origin in 271 cases. On the contrary, in ALSA group, the LVA arose from LSA in all cases.
Kommerell diverticulum (KD) appears as a dilatation at the origin of the ARSA and coexist in 14.9% cases. In our study, none of the 11 patients exhibited KD. It was observed that KD was more common in men with aberrant subclavian arteries and was more frequently associated with ALSA in comparison to ARSA.
Awareness of the presence of ARSA is crucial for successful outcome of mediastinal, esophageal, and thoracic spine surgeries. Association with Kommerell's diverticulum and aneurysm of the diverticulum is a high-risk feature. The presence of this variant makes right radial artery approach for cardiac catheterization extremely difficult and unsuccessful. Manipulation of endoscopes and other instruments through the esophagus may damage this aberrant vessel leading to catastrophic bleeding. Pathological formation of arterio-esophageal fistula leads to life-threatening upper GI bleeding. This anomaly is associated with nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve whose presence can complicate thyroid, parathyroid, and lower neck surgeries. May be associated with Di George syndrome, Trisomy-21 and some congenital cardiac anomalies such as tetralogy of Fallot and conotruncal anomalies. It has also been suggested that the presence of aberrant subclavian artery is an anatomical marker for 22.q11 deletion syndrome.
| Conclusion|| |
Recent application of various endovascular, surgical, neurological, and radiological interventional procedures has kindled interest to evaluate branching pattern variations of aortic arch. ARSA is generally detected incidentally and its presence should alert the clinician to look for any associated vascular and cardiac anomalies. Multi-detector CT is the modality of choice as it accurately depicts vascular anomalies and can be used before planning any interventions.
The authors acknowledge the technical assistance rendered by Mr. Sushil Kumar of Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar and Mr. Pran Prakash of Jaswant Rai Superspeciality Hospital, Meerut in preparation of images.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Natsis KI, Tsitouridis IA, Didagelos MV, Fillipidis AA, Vlasis KG, Tsikaras PD. Anatomical variations in the branches of the human aortic arch in 633 angiographies: Clinical significance and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 2009;31:319-23.
Popieluszko P, Henry BM, Sanna B, Hsieh WC, Saganiak K, Pękala PA, et al
. A systematic review and meta-analysis of variations in branching patterns of the adult aortic arch. J Vasc Surg 2018;68:298-306.
Recto C, Boddi M, Branco JJ, Morucci G, Pacini A, Gulisano M, et al
. Aortic arch branching pattern variation: Its incidence on a 20030 cases review. Italian J Anat Embryol 2019;124:5-15.
Yusuf TE, Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, Harewood GC, Rajan E, et al
. Utility of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of aberrant right subclavian artery. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22:1717-21.
Polguj M, Stefanczyk L, Topol M. The epidemiological, morphological and clinical aspects of the aberrant right subclavian artery (Arteria lusoria). Intech 2016. [doi: 10.5772/64604].
Polguj M, Chrzanowski L, Kasprzak JD, Stefanczyk L, Topol M, Majos A. The aberrant right subclavian artery (Arterial lusoria): The morphological and clinical aspects of one of the most important variations – A systematic study of 141 reports. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:292734.
Molz G, Burri B. Aberrant subclavian artery (Arteria lusoria): Sex differences in the prevalence of various forms of the malformation. Evaluation of 1378 observations. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1978;380:303-15.
Priya S, Thomas R, Nagpal P, Sharma A, Steigner M. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2018;8:S26-44.
Haesemeyer SW, Gavant ML. Imaging of acute traumatic aortic tear in patients with an aberrant right subclavian artery. Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:117-20.
De Luca L, Bergman JJ, Tytgat GN, Fockens P. EUS imaging of the arteria lusoria: Case series and review. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:670-3.
Abhaichand RK, Louvard Y, Gobeil JF, Loubeyre C, Lefèvre T, Morice MC. The problem of arteria lusoria in right transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;54:196-201.
Kelly MD. Endoscopy and the aberrant right subclavian artery. Am Surg 2007;73:1259-61.
Nie B, Zhou YJ, Li GZ, Shi DM, Wang JL. Clinical study of arterial anatomic variations for transradial coronary procedure in Chinese population. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009;122:2097-102.
Berko NS, Jain VR, Godelman A, Stein EG, Ghosh S, Haramati LB. Variants and anomalies of thoracic vasculature on computed tomographic angiography in adults. J Comput Assist Tomogra 2009;33:523-8.
Piyavisetpat N, Thaksinawisut P, Tuinkosit M. Aortic arch branches' variations detected on chest CT. Asian Biomed 2011;5:817-23.
Muller M, Schimtz BL, Pauls S, Schick M, Rohrer S, Kappa T, et al
. Variations of the aortic arch – A study on the most common branching patterns. Acta Radiol 2011;52:738-42.
Sunitha V, Narasinga Rao B. A study on the anatomical organization of the aortic arch anomalies. J Clin Diagn Res 2012;6:1127-31.
Mata-Escolanto F, Aparicio-Bellver L, Matinez-Sanjuan V, Sanchis-Gimeno JA. Aortic branch variations: An anatomical study in 900 subjects. Sci Res Essays 2012;7:2213-7.
Celikyay ZR, Koner AE, Celikyay F, Denız C, Acu B, Firat MM. Frequency and imaging findings of variations in human aortic arch anatomy based on multidetector computed tomography data. Clin Imaging 2013;37:1011-9.
Uchino A, Saito N, Okada Y, Kozawa E, Nishi N, Mizukoshi W, et al
. Variation of the origin of the left common carotid artery diagnosed by CT angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 2013;35:339-42.
Shakeri A, Pourisa M, Deldar A, Goldust M. Anatomical variations of aortic arch branches and relationship with diameter of the aortic arch by 64-row CT angiography. Pak J Biol Sci 2013;16:496-500.
Basti RS, Kumar S. Evaluation of anatomical variations in the aortic arch branching pattern in south Indian population using computed tomography. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol 2014;12:280-4.
Rea G, Valente T, Iaselli F, Urraro F, Izzo A, Sica G, et al
. Multi-detector computed tomography in the evaluation of variants and anomalies of aortic arch and its branching pattern. Ital J Anat Embryol 2014;119:180-92.
Karacan A, Türkvatan A, Karacan K. Anatomical variations of aortic arch branching: Evaluation with computed tomographic angiography. Cardiol Young 2014;24:485-93.
Lale P, Toprak U, Yagiz G, Kaya T, Uyanik SA. Variations in the branching pattern of the aortic arch detected with computerized tomography angiography. Adv Radiol 2014;2014:969728.
Boyaci N, Dokumaci DS, Karakas E, Yildiz S, Cece H, Kocarslan A, et al
. Multidetector computed tomography evaluation of aortic arch and branching variants. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2015;23:51-7.
Ergun O, Tatar İG, Birgi E, Durmaz HA, Akçalar S, Kurt A, et al
. Angiographic evaluation of branching pattern and anatomy of the aortic arch. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2015;43:219-26.
Tapia GP, Zhu X, Xu J, Liang P, Su G, Liu H, et al
. Incidence of branching patterns variations of the arch in aortic dissection in Chinese patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e795.
Wang L, Zhang J, Xin S. Morphologic features of the aortic arch and its branches in the adult Chinese population. J Vasc Surg 2016;64:1602-80.
Jalali Kondori B, Asadi MH, Rahimian E, Tahsini MR. Anatomical variations in aortic arch branching pattern. Arch Iran Med 2016;19:72-4.
Sankhe AP, Ukirde V, Gomes CV, Pai S, Kulkarni S. MDCT evaluation of variations in branching patterns of aortic arch: Study of 830 Indian patients. Int J Biomed Adv Res 2016;7:329-36.
Skouroumouni G, Panagiotidou D, Lelegianni M, Stratilati S, Tsitouridis I, Thessaloniki GR. Aberrant right subclavian artery as an incidental finding in chest MDCT: Evaluation and imaging features. ECR 2017:C-0983. [doi: 10.1594/ecr2017/C-0983].
Krupiński M, Irzyk M, Moczulski Z, Banyś R, Dwojak I, Urbańczyk-Zawadzka M. CT evaluation of aberrant right subclavian artery: Anatomy and clinical implications. Cardiol Young 2019;29:128-32.
Choi Y, Chung SB, Kim MS. Prevalence and anatomy of aberrant right subclavian artery evaluated by computed tomographic angiography at a single institution in Korea. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2019;62:175-82.
Krishnan VK, Narayan V, Ibrahim N, Mathew J, James SM. Imaging spectrum and prevalence of variant branching pattern of aortic arch. Int J Res Med Sci 2019;7:1313-8.
Natsis K, Didagelos M, Gkiouliava A, Lazaridis N, Vyzas V, Piagkou M. The aberrant right subclavian artery: Cadaveric study and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 2017;39:559-65.
Natsis K, Didagelos M, Gkiouliava A, Lazaridis N, Vyzas V, Piagkou M. Erratum to: The aberrant right subclavian artery: Cadaveric study and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 2017;39:1181-2.
Polednak AP. Prevalence of the aberrant right subclavian artery reported in a published systematic review of cadaveric studies: The impact of an outlier. Clin Anat 2017;30:1024-8.
Zapata H, Edwards JE, Titus JL. Aberrant right subclavian artery with left aortic arch: Associated cardiac anomalies. Pediatr Cardiol 1993;14:159-61.
Saito T, Tamatsukuri Y, Hitosugi T, Miyakawa K, Shimizu T, Oi Y, et al
. Three cases of retroesophageal right subclavian artery. J Nippon Med Sch 2005;72:375-82.
Nayak SR, Pai MM, Prabhu LV, D'Costa S, Shetty P. Anatomical organization of aortic arch variations in the India: Embryological basis and review. J Vasc Bras 2006;5:95-100.
Poonam Jyoti N, Singla RK. Prevalence of retroesophageal right subclavian artery. Int J Biol Med Res 2013;4:3422-25.
Chavda H, Varlekar P, Khatri C, Saiyad SS, Bhatt R. Abnormal origin of right subclavian artery – A cadaveric study. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2014;3:85-8.
Panchal P, Prasad A, Singh S, Bhadain PP, Kumari R. A study of variations of subclavian artery and its clinical implication. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2017;6:1610-3.
Qiu Y, Wu X, Zhuang Z, Li X, Zhu L, Huang C, et al
. Anatomical variations of the aortic arch branches in a sample of Chinese cadavers: Embryological basis and literature review. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2019;28:622-8.
Keet K, Gunston G, Alexander R. Variations in the branching pattern of the aortic arch: An African perspective. Eur J Anat 2019;23:91-102.
Hanzic N, Cizmarevic U, Lesjak V, Caf P. Aberrant right subclavian artery with a bicarotid trunk: The importance of diagnosing this rare incidental anomaly. Cureus II 2019;11:e6094.
Natsis K, Didagelos M, Manoli SM, Papathanasiou E, Sofidis G, Anastasopoulos N. A bicarotid trunk in association with an aberrant right subclavian artery. Report of two cases, clinical impact, and review of the literature. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2011;70:68-73.
Welsh P, Lucacin C, Hockley S. The simultaneous presence of a bicarotid trunk and a retroesophageal right subclavian artery: A case report with clinical impact. Eur J Anat 2015;19:381-5.
Kumar S, Kumar P. Truncus bicaroticus with aberrant right subclavian artery and origin of right vertebral from right common carotid artery. Surg Radiol Anat 2014;36:829-31.
Keet K, Gunston G. An unusual case of three branches arising from the aortic arch: Bicarotid trunk, left subclavian artery and aberrant right subclavian artery. Eur J Anat 2018;22:429-32.
Gluncic V, Marusic A. Association of the truncus bicaroticus, common trunk of the left subclavian and vertebral arteries and retroesophageal right subclavian artery. Ann Anat 2000;182:281-3.
Turkbey B, Hazirolan T, Canyigit M, Peynircioglu B, Cil BE. Coexistence of aberrant right subclavian artery and common carotid trunk: Diagnosis with CT angiography. Eur J Radiol Extra 2007;62:63-4.
Granite G, Meshida K, Jones S. Rare case of five branched aortic arch exhibiting a retroesophageal right subclavian artery and an accessory left vertebral artery. Int J Anat Var 2018;11:117-22.
Velioglu M, Kaya S, Ertugrul EE. Arteries get confused: An arch variation. JBR-BTR 2014;97:28-9.
Tsai IC, Tzeng WS, Lee T, Jan SL, Fu YC, Chen MC, et al
. Vertebral and carotid artery anomalies in patients with aberrant right subclavian arteries. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:1007-12.
Plotkin A, Ng B, Han SM, Weaver FA, Han SW, Bowdish ME, et al
. Association of aberrant subclavian arteries with aortic pathology and proposed classification system. J Vasc Surg 2020;7:1534-43.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
[Table 1], [Table 2]