|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 153-158
Teeth as an anatomical modality for age estimation using radiographic approach
Kusum Singal1, Neelkamal Sharma1, Permila Singh2, Vikas Kumar1
1 Department of Genetics, MDU, Rohtak, Haryana, India
2 Department of Statistics, GCW, Rohtak, Haryana, India
|Date of Submission||11-Jul-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||16-Aug-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||15-Oct-2019|
Dr. Neelkamal Sharma
Department of Genetics, MDU, Rohtak, Haryana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Age estimation of adult individuals represents an important part of forensic anthropology, forensic medicine, forensic osteology, and forensic dentistry. Teeth proved to be a perfect anatomical tool for age estimation. The study was performed with aim to evaluate the coronal pulp cavity index (CPCI) using radiographic approach and to correlate the CPCI with the real age, i.e. chronological age of the individuals. Material and Methods: CPCI was radiographically evaluated using radiovisiographs (RVGs) of 320 individuals (160 males and 160 females) having age range of 15–54 years. The sample comprised of 1280 RVGs of 4 teeth per individual (maxillary canine, maxillary second premolar, mandibular canine, and mandibular first premolar). Two radiographic measurements were performed on all radiographs. One is coronal pulp height and another one is height of crown (coronal height). CPCI for each radiograph was calculated and correlated with the chronological age of the study individuals using statistical software SPSS (Version 21). Results: Intra-observer agreement of CPCI measurements was almost perfect. The accuracy of regression models, when applied to different set of radiograph samples, was within acceptable range of differences in the forensic anthropology. Discussion and Conclusions: All the selected teeth showed a strong negative correlation with the chronological age. However, all selected teeth do not have equal applicability for age estimation suggesting that further evaluation on different samples for teeth specific regression models for age estimation.
Keywords: Adults, age estimation, forensic anthropology, forensic dentistry, radiovisiographs
|How to cite this article:|
Singal K, Sharma N, Singh P, Kumar V. Teeth as an anatomical modality for age estimation using radiographic approach. J Anat Soc India 2019;68:153-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Singal K, Sharma N, Singh P, Kumar V. Teeth as an anatomical modality for age estimation using radiographic approach. J Anat Soc India [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 21];68:153-8. Available from: http://www.jasi.org.in/text.asp?2019/68/2/153/269050
| Introduction|| |
Age estimation is living as well as dead is one of the foremost queries to be resolve by the forensic scientists. Various parts of the human body can be utilized as a recognizable proof for this purpose. Alternate parts of the body such as skull, pelvic bones, and long bone ossification centers may can be utilized for age estimation. However, mass disasters such as serious crashes or flames, tsunami, earthquakes, or internment conditions make different parts unsatisfactory for use as an age indicator. In such type of situations, teeth being least influenced by all the environmental conditions proved to be one of the best evidence available for estimation of age. Dynamic morphology of the teeth such as outer enamel in the crown area and cementum in root region make them highly resistant against any kind of damage. Dental age estimation in kids depends on formative stages and eruption sequence of teeth and is quiet basic and easy process while in adults, it is a bulky process. With the end goal of dental age estimation, different techniques have been produced. These include exceptionally mind-boggling, tedious, and ruinous methods, for example, transparency of dentin, tooth cementum annulations, and aspartic acid racemization.,, Deposition of secondary dentin is a one of the age-related changes that can be studied for the purpose of age estimation. Histological sectioning of teeth and radiographic method are the two ways described in literature for the assessment of secondary dentine.,
The radiographic method is a nondestructive procedure that can be used both in living and dead individual when contrasted with other tedious, costly, and dangerous techniques requiring extracted tooth that may emerge moral, religious, social, or logical issues.,, In addition, strategies such as digitization of all radiographs and computer-assisted imaging software will reduce the subjective errors and thus enhance the reliability, accuracy, and precision of results., The present study was conducted with the aim of age estimation from teeth using nondestructive approach.
| Material and Methods|| |
This investigation was performed on radiovisiographs (RVGs) gathered from individuals visiting to the Department of Oral Diagnosis Medicine and Radiology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak and PDM Dental College and Research Institute, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India. These radiographs were taken as a part of the routine treatment that is being rendered to the patient. Gnatus radiographic imaging system with standard specifications (7–10 mA, 0.05 s exposure time, 70 kV voltage), Kodak sensor and XCP-CP sensor holder were used for taking RVGs of the study individuals. Radiographic images were taken using paralleling technique only after performing the oral clinical examination. To normalize the angulations and magnification errors among X-rays, grid was used and all measurements were taken in the form of ratios only. The radiographs were recorded in digital form. To overcome the magnification and angulations differences, grid was used while taking RVGs of each tooth. Protocol of the study was approved by Institutional Human Ethical Committee, MDU Rohtak (Ethical clearance dated July 4, 2017).
- RVGs chosen were of the individuals matured in the vicinity of 15 and 54 years
- Teeth selected for the study were completely erupted into the oral cavity.
- Teeth with any pathology, for example, caries or periodontitis and periapical sores
- Malaligned or pivoted teeth
- Teeth with any prosthetic fittings
- Individuals suffering from systemic disorders such as endocrine disorders, diabetes, and gastrointestinal were excluded from the study
- Pregnant and lactating mothers were also excluded from the study.
Radiographic pictures of the all teeth were handled utilizing computer-assisted imaging program ADOBE Photoshop version CS6. The sequential age of the patient was computed by substracting the date of radiograph from the date of birth of the patient. Two radiographic parameters were measured on each radiograph. One is coronal height (CH) and another one is coronal pulp cavity height (CPH) [Figure 1]. Coronal pulp cavity index (CPCI) was calculated after that using formula CPH/CH × 100. Morphological factors and the sequential age of all the study individuals were entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Relationship coefficient was assessed for each tooth as well as for males and females. The assessed age was then contrasted and the sequential age of the person.
|Figure 1: Parameters measured for maxillary second premolar (between two vertical lines). CPH: Coronal pulp height, CH: Crown height|
Click here to view
| Results|| |
The study was conducted on 1280 RVGs obtained from 320 individuals (160 males and 160 females). The sample was divided into four age groups. Each study subset has equal number of observations [Table 1]. Data were tabulated into Microsoft excel sheet. Linear regression was done for each tooth utilizing statistical software SPSS (Version 21, IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). The outcomes were computed and related with the chronologic age for assessment. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation were done to link mean sequential age with mean evaluated age by CPCI strategy. The significance limit was set at 5%. To prevent or minimize intra-observer errors, all measurements were carried out twice after an interval of 2 weeks by the same observer. Intra-observer reproducibility and reliability (99.96%) of measurements was studied using the concordance correlation coefficient (P< 0.05). Intra-observer reliability of measurement for CPH, CH, and CPCI was 99.95%, 99.96%, and 99.96%, respectively. The regression analysis has been used to find the linear equations for predicting age using CPCI. Teeth-wise and gender-wise r2 represented by scatter diagram [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. Coefficient of determination (r2) calculated ranges from 0.916 to 0.968.
|Figure 2: Scatter diagram and linear regression equations for different teeth. (a) 23 (maxillary canine) (b) 25 (maxillary second premolar) (c) 33 (mandibular canine) (d) 34 (mandibular first premolar) for whole Female study samples|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Scatter diagram and linear regression equations for different teeth. (a) 23 (maxillary canine) (b) 25 (maxillary second premolar) (c) 33 (mandibular canine) (d) 34 (mandibular first premolar) for whole male study samples|
Click here to view
Descriptive Statistics was analyzed for all selected teeth and female and male study individuals separately [Table 2] and [Table 3]. Regression equations were developed for different study teeth in male and female study individuals.
|Table 2: Descriptive statistics for all selected teeth of female study individuals|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Descriptive statistics for all selected teeth of male study individuals|
Click here to view
- Maxillary canine Y = 71.934 − 1.70 × X
- Maxillary second premolar Y = 75.017 − 1.187 × X
- Mandibular canine Y = 73.511–1.116 × X
- Mandibularfirst premolar Y = 67.934 − 0.999 × X.
For males, regression equation;
- Maxillary canine Y = 74.182 − 1.129 × X
- Maxillary second premolar Y = 75.932 − 1.205 × X
- Mandibular canine Y = 72.725 − 1.10 × X
- Mandibularfirst premolar Y = 68.330 − 1.016 × X.
Where Y is the age to be estimated, and X is the CPCI of the teeth.
Inter-teeth correlations were assessed using Pearson test. The correlation between chronological age and CPCI of selected teeth was indicated by R2. The high value of R2 indicates the strong negative correlation. With increasing age value of CPCI goes on decreasing. R2 value for each tooth has been generated for male individuals and female individuals [Table 4] and [Table 5].
|Table 4: Inter-teeth correlations of different teeth in whole female samples|
Click here to view
|Table 5: Inter-teeth correlations of different teeth in whole male samples|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Forensic Anthropology works for three major area gender determination, age estimation, and stature estimation. Besides gender, age is another most important biological parameter of identification. Bones as well other skeletal remains play a very important role in age estimation. Although a lot of age estimation methods are available in the literature.
The present study was conducted with the aim to correlate the dimensions of coronal pulp with the chronological age of the study individuals. The study data consist of 1280 RVGs of maxillary canine, maxillary second premolar, mandibular canine, and mandibularfirst premolar tooth collected from 320 individuals having age range of 15–54 years. In the present study, the accurate age estimation percentage was higher in the male population as compared to female individuals [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. This may be an expression of size of the pulp cavity is larger in males as males tend to have larger teeth. Premolar teeth were showing less standard deviation as compared to other teeth. The value of standard deviation ranges from 9.44 (in males) to 9.59 (in females) [Table 2] and [Table 3]. The results of present suggest that CPCI of all the selected teeth showed a negative correlation with chronological age which is in accordance with previous studies conducted by Drusini et al., Ikeda et al., Igbigbi and Nyirenda.,, The correlation was observed to be high for premolars in contrast to other teeth included in the study in both males and females [Table 4] and [Table 5]. This could be attributed to physiological wear and masticatory forces thus compromising crown height measurements and increasing deposition of secondary dentin. As compared to studies conducted by Igbigbi and Nyirenda in Malawian populations and Zadzinska et al. in Caucasian, we have observed a higher degree of accuracy using CPCI method in the present study that highlights the importance of population-specific regression equations.,
| Conclusion|| |
The investigation could be concluded that among all teeth, maxillary second premolar was observed to be the best pointer for age estimation in the two sexual orientations. This demonstrates the importance of teeth specific regression formulas. An exceedingly critical relationship of age with CPCI was accounted in Haryana population. In spite of the fact that a considerable measure of research had been done in the region of age estimation; however, these investigations were directed in various populations, hampering examinations of their precision. To accomplish more exact age estimation, there is a requirement for verifying population-specific studies with bigger sample size and considering diverse natural factors, for example, dietary propensities, hereditary foundation and history of any disease that can influence the exactness of results. Advancement of these gender-specific and population-specific age estimation models may prove useful to forensic odontologists and anthropologists in various criminal and civil cases.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Komar DA. Forensic Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Lewis JM, Senn DR. Dental age estimation utilizing third molar development: A review of principles, methods, and population studies used in the United States. Forensic Sci Int 2010;201:79-83.
Rai B, Kaur J, Cingolani M, Ferrante L, Cameriere R. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth: An Indian formula. Int J Legal Med 2010;124:237-41.
Fernandes MM, Tinoco RL, de Braganca DP, de Lima SH, Francesquini Junior L, Daruge Junior E, et al.
Age estimation by measurements of developing teeth: Accuracy of Cameriere's method on a Brazilian sample. J Forensic Sci 2011;56:1616-9.
Martrille L, Ubelaker DH, Cattaneo C, Seguret F, Tremblay M, Baccino E, et al.
Comparison of four skeletal methods for the estimation of age at death on white and black adults. J Forensic Sci 2007;52:302-7.
Singal K, Neelkamal S. Dental radiology: An adjunctive aid in age estimation. Ann Essences Dent 2017;9:8c-11c.
Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001;19:9-17.
Yang F, Jacobs R, Willems G. Dental age estimation through volume matching of teeth imaged by cone-beam CT. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159 Suppl 1:S78-83.
Joseph CC, Reddy BS, Cherian NM, Kannan SK, George G, Jose S. Intraoral digital radiography for adult age estimation: A reliable technique. JIAOMR 2013; 25:287-90.
Das M, Nayyar AS, Punhani N, Puri H, Rohilla R, Chalapathi KV, et al
. Validation of Kvaal's and Cameriere's methods of age estimation in people of Marathwada origin. CHRISMED J Health Res 2017;4:238-47. [Full text]
Meinl A. The Application of Dental Age Estimation Methods: Comparative Validity and Problems in Practical Implementation. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna; 2008.
Godge P, Shubhra Sharma S, Vibhakar P, Kulkarni A, Shroff J. Age estimation using orthopantomographs- A forensic study. Int J Oral Care Res 2014;2:26-30.
Drusini AG, Toso O, Ranzato C. The coronal pulp cavity index: A biomarker for age determination in human adults. Am J Phys Anthropol 1997;103:353-63.
Ikeda N, Umetsu K, Kashimura S, Suzuki T, Oumi M. Estimation of age from teeth with their soft X-ray findings. Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi 1985;39:244-50.
Igbigbi PS, Nyirenda SK. Age estimation of Malawian adults from dental radiographs. West Afr J Med 2005;24:329-33.
Zadzinska E, Drusini AG, Carrara N. The comparison between two age estimation methods based on human teeth. Anthropol Rev 2000;63:95-101.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]